Important News:SafeLogic Announces General Availability of CryptoComply BoringCrypto! Read the announcement.
PQC Readiness Is Operational: Move Beyond Discovery
February 24, 2026 •SafeLogic
Executive Summary:
PQC readiness is an operating model, not a one-time migration. Discovery shows where exposure might exist; continuous remediation is what reduces it.
Download the Continuous PQC Remediation Checklist to operationalize quantum-risk remediation in design reviews, vendor onboarding, and platform changes. Use the checklist to apply triggers, prioritization, governance, and validation in day-to-day workflows.
Why PQC Readiness Can’t Be a One-Time Migration
Most organizations understand that, within a few years, quantum computers will crack widely used public-key cryptography, and that preparing for that moment will take years.
Many start with planning and discovery: cataloging cryptographic assets, identifying algorithms, and mapping exposure.
That work matters. But it doesn't reduce risk until production behavior changes.
Post-quantum risk exposure exists today and grows as environments change—new apps, integrations, and dependencies can continuously introduce exposure if a remediation plan isn’t in place.
Treating readiness as a large, linear migration creates a familiar outcome: discovery expands, planning stretches on, and remediation gets deferred to a later “phase” that never quite arrives.
A more effective approach is operational and incremental: reduce exposure where you can now, ensure new deployments improve PQC readiness, learn from outcomes, and expand coverage over time.
Post-quantum readiness isn’t something you finish.
It’s something you maintain.
If your roadmap currently ends at “discovery,” you have a gap. The Continuous PQC Remediation Checklist helps bridge the gap between knowing your exposure and reducing it—by using repeatable controls that fit into operational workflows.
It includes triggers, prioritization guidance, exception governance, and validation checks you can reuse across change workflows.

Why Doesn’t PQC Discovery Reduce Risk on Its Own?
Discovery is essential. Organizations need visibility into where cryptography is used, which algorithms are in place, and how systems and dependencies are connected. Without that understanding, responsible planning is impossible.
But discovery doesn’t change production behavior:
- An inventory doesn’t change what algorithms are negotiated in production
- An assessment doesn’t update a library or rotate a key
- Even the most complete discovery is still a point-in-time snapshot
A static inventory isn’t a security control. Discovery is useful, but it doesn’t reduce exposure unless it feeds a durable operating loop: remediation that occurs as change happens, controls that operate continuously, and governance that ensures improvements persist.
In dynamic environments, the “snapshot problem” is immediate. Services are integrated, vendors ship updates, infrastructure evolves, and architectural decisions quietly introduce or preserve legacy cryptographic behavior. Each change can reintroduce exposure regardless of how thorough the last discovery exercise was.
This is where many PQC initiatives stall: discovery improves awareness, but without an operational path to remediation, teams gain awareness without meaningfully reducing exposure.
Visibility is an input. Remediation is the outcome.

Planning vs. Operations: What Actually Changes?
Visualizing the difference helps clarify why programs get stuck.
| Waterfall Planning | Continuous Remediation |
| Optimizes for a future "migration phase". | Optimizes for reducing exposure today. |
| Treats PQC as a one-time program. | Treats PQC as an operating model. |
| Relies on point-in-time inventories. | Embeds controls in change workflows. |
| Risk accumulates during the wait. | Risk is reduced incrementally as systems change. |
Use this as a quick gut-check for whether your program is stuck in planning or built for continuous remediation.
What PQC Readiness Looks Like in Practice
A practical definition of "ready" includes:
- Inventory coverage
- Change-triggered review
- Exception governance
- Remediation playbooks (including hybrid where needed)
- Validation/monitoring to prevent regression

Is Crypto-Agility Enough for PQC Readiness?
Cryptographic agility—the ability to update or replace cryptographic algorithms without major re-architecture—is essential. Without it, PQC migration becomes brittle, risky, and slow.
But agility alone is not risk reduction.
Agility is capability. Remediation is execution.
Systems can be technically agile and still operate with quantum-vulnerable cryptography for years if there’s no operational mechanism to drive change.
Post-quantum risk is reduced when cryptography changes in production in response to evolving constraints—standards maturity, vendor readiness, architectural evolution, and emerging threats.
To make crypto-agility real, organizations pair it with:
- Triggers: when remediation should occur
- Prioritization: where to focus first
- Governance: how decisions stick over time
- Validation: how you prevent regression
Operationalizing PQC Readiness: A Practical Next Step
Strategy documents and roadmaps describe what needs to change. Discovery explains where cryptography exists.
What’s often missing is the operational bridge: a practical way to ensure remediation happens consistently, as part of normal work.
A control-based approach helps bridge that gap.
The goal is to make cryptographic improvements repeatable through agility (change is possible), governance (decisions stick), and continuous remediation (risk declines over time).
Get the Continuous PQC Remediation Checklist
A practical, control-based guide for operationalizing post-quantum remediation.
Use it to:
- Trigger remediation during design reviews, platform updates, and vendor onboarding
- Prioritize actions based on exposure and data sensitivity
- Govern exceptions with ownership and review paths
- Support hybrid and compliance-aligned approaches where needed
This isn’t about completing a checklist once and moving on. It’s about establishing an operating rhythm that steadily improves cryptographic posture.
Ready to Operationalize Continuous PQC Remediation?
Download the Continuous PQC Remediation Checklist to embed risk-based controls into design reviews, vendor onboarding, and platform changes.
Have questions about prioritization, hybrid approaches, or operational controls in your environment? Talk to a SafeLogic expert to review your current posture and identify the next steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
You reduce post-quantum risk today through continuous remediation: risk-based improvements triggered by change. Focus first on high-exposure services and sensitive or long-lived data, apply hybrid approaches where full PQC isn’t feasible, and govern exceptions so exposure doesn’t quietly return.
Post-quantum cryptographic remediation is the ongoing process of reducing cryptographic exposure over time as systems, dependencies, and constraints evolve. Unlike one-time migration planning, remediation emphasizes incremental, no-regret improvements that can be repeated as environments change.
Crypto-agility is the capability to change algorithms without major rework. PQC remediation is the action of making those changes in production to reduce exposure consistently with governance and validation.
After discovery, the next step is operationalizing it: prioritize risk, remediate where feasible, govern exceptions, and repeat as change happens. That’s what turns PQC readiness from awareness into risk reduction.
SafeLogic
Founded in 2012, SafeLogic’s validated, holistic, and interoperable cryptographic software products enable enduring privacy and trust in the ever-changing digital world. Used by many of the world’s top technology firms, SafeLogic expedites and streamlines the adoption of FIPS 140-validated classical and post-quantum cryptography, strong entropy, and crypto-agility.
Popular Posts
Search for posts
Tags
- FIPS 140 (109)
- FIPS Validation (80)
- NIST (66)
- CryptoComply (63)
- Encryption (61)
- Cryptography (60)
- CMVP (51)
- Cryptographic Module (49)
- Industry News (47)
- Compliance (44)
- RapidCert (42)
- Conversations (34)
- Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) (32)
- SafeLogic News (31)
- FIPS 140-3 (27)
- CAVP (23)
- Federal (23)
- OpenSSL (20)
- Cybersecurity (17)
- FedRAMP (14)
- Government (14)
- Healthcare (12)
- DoD (11)
- CMMC (8)
- NIST 800-53 (7)
- Entropy Source Validation (5)
- NIST 800-171 (5)
- iOS (5)
- Common Criteria (4)
- Crypto-Agility (4)
- Entropy (4)
- GovRAMP (4)
- RSA Conference (4)
- TLS 1.3 (4)
- Public Sector (3)
- FIPS 140-2 (2)
- DoDIN APL (1)
- Finance (1)

